Omicron Subvariants: Clinical, Laboratory, and Cell Culture Characterization (preprint)

Background The variant of concern, Omicron, has become the sole circulating SARS-CoV-2 variant for the past several months. Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2, BA.3, BA.4, and BA.5 evolved over the time, with BA.1 causing the largest wave of infections globally in December 2021- January 2022. In this study, we compare the clinical outcomes in patients infected with different Omicron subvariants and compare the relative viral loads, and recovery of infectious virus from upper respiratory specimens. Methods SARS-CoV-2 positive remnant clinical specimens, diagnosed at the Johns Hopkins Microbiology Laboratory between December 2021 and July 2022, were used for whole genome sequencing. The clinical outcomes of infections with Omicron subvariants were compared to infections with BA.1. Cycle threshold values Ct and the recovery of infectious virus on VeroTMPRSS2 cell line from clinical specimens were compared. Results The BA.1 was associated with the largest increase in SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate and COVID-19 related hospitalizations at the Johns Hopkins system. After a peak in January cases fell in the spring, but the emergence of BA.2.12.1 followed by BA.5 in May 2022 led to an increase in case positivity and admissions. BA.1 infections had a lower mean Ct when compared to other Omicron subvariants. BA.5 samples had a greater likelihood of having infectious virus at Ct values less than 20. Conclusions Omicron subvariants continue to associate with a relatively high positivity and admissions. The BA.5 infections are more while BA.2 infections are less likely to have infectious virus, suggesting potential differences in infectibility during the Omicron waves.

Limitations of molecular and antigen test performance for SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 contacts (preprint)

Objectives: COVID-19 has brought unprecedented attention to the crucial role of diagnostics in pandemic control. We compared SARS-CoV-2 test performance by sample type and modality in close contacts of SARS-CoV-2 cases. Methods: Close contacts of SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals were enrolled after informed consent. Clinician-collected nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs in viral transport media (VTM) were tested with a nucleic acid test (NAT). NP VTM and self-collected passive drool were tested using the PerkinElmer real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assay. For the first 4 months of study, mid-turbinate swabs were tested using the BD Veritor rapid antigen test. NAT positive NP samples were tested for infectivity using a VeroE6TMPRSS2 cell culture model. Results: Between November 17, 2020, and October 1, 2021, 235 close contacts of SARS-CoV-2 cases were recruited, including 95 with symptoms (82% symptomatic for <5 days) and 140 asymptomatic individuals. NP swab reference tests were positive for 53 (22.6%) participants; 24/50 (48%) were culture positive. PerkinElmer testing of NP and saliva samples identified an additional 28 (11.9%) SARS-CoV-2 cases who tested negative by clinical NAT. Antigen tests performed for 99 close contacts showed 83% positive percent agreement (PPA) with reference NAT among early symptomatic persons, but 18% PPA in others; antigen tests in 8 of 11 (72.7%) culture-positive participants were positive. Conclusions: Contacts of SARS-CoV-2 cases may be falsely negative early after contact, which more sensitive platforms may identify. Repeat or serial SARS-CoV-2 testing with both antigen and molecular assays may be warranted for individuals with high pretest probability for infection.

A Quick Displacement of the SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta with Omicron: Unprecedented Spike in COVID-19 Cases Associated with Fewer Admissions and Comparable Upper Respiratory Viral Loads (preprint)

BackgroundThe increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections in December 2021 in the United States was driven primarily by the Omicron variant which largely displaced the Delta over a three week span. Outcomes from infection with the Omicron remain uncertain. We evaluate whether clinical outcomes and viral loads differ between Delta and Omicron infections during the period when both variants were co-circulating. MethodsRemnant clinical specimens from patients that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 after standard of care testing between the last week of November and the end of December 2021were used for whole viral genome sequencing. Cycle threshold values (Ct) for viral RNA, the presence of infectious virus, and levels of respiratory IgG were measured, and clinical outcomes were obtained. Differences in each measure were compared between variants stratified by vaccination status. ResultsThe Omicron variant displaced the Delta during the study period and constituted 95% of the circulating lineages by the end of December 2021. Patients with Omicron infections (N= 1121) were more likely to be vaccinated compared to patients with Delta (N = 910), but were less likely to be admitted, require ICU level care, or succumb to infection regardless of vaccination status. There was no significant difference in Ct values based on the lineage regardless of the vaccination status. Recovery of infectious virus in cell culture was reduced in boosted patients compared to fully vaccinated without a booster and unvaccinated when infected with the Delta lineage. However, in patients with Omicron infections, recovery of infectious virus was not affected by vaccination. ConclusionsOmicron infections of vaccinated individuals are expected, yet admissions are less frequent. Admitted patients might develop severe disease comparable to Delta. Efforts for reducing the Omicron transmission are required as even though the admission risk is lower, the numbers of infections continue to be high. Research in context Evidence before this studyThe unprecedented increase in COVID-19 cases in the month of December 2021, associated with the displacement of the Delta variant with the Omicron, triggered a lot of concerns. An understanding of the disease severity associated with infections with Omicron is essential as well as the virological determinants that contributed to its widespread predominance. We searched PubMed for articles published up to January 23, 2022, using the search terms ("Omicron") AND ("Disease severity") as well as ("Omicron") AND ("Viral load") And/ or ("Cell culture"). Our search yielded 3 main studies that directly assessed the omicrons clinical severity in South Africa, its infectious viral load compared to Delta, and the dynamics of viral RNA shedding. In South Africa, compared to Delta, Omicron infected patients showed a significant reduction in severe disease. In this study, Omicron and non-Omicron variants were characterized based on S gene target failure using the TaqPath COVID-19 PCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In the study from Switzerland that assessed the infectious viral load in Omicron versus Delta, the authors analyzed only 18 Omicron samples that were all from vaccinated individuals to show that compared to Delta, Omicron had equivalent infectious viral titers. The third study that assessed the Omicron viral dynamics showed that the peak viral RNA in Omicron infections is lower than Delta. No published studies assessed the clinical discrepancies of Omicron and Delta infected patients from the US, nor comprehensively assessed, by viral load and cell culture studies, the characteristics of both variants stratified by vaccination status. Added value of this studyTo the best of our knowledge, this is the only study to date to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes after infection with the Omicron variant compared to Delta in the US using variants characterized by whole genome sequencing and a selective time frame when both variant co-circulated. It is also the first study to stratify the analysis based on the vaccination status and to compare fully vaccinated patients who didnt receive a booster vaccination to patients who received a booster vaccination. In addition, we provide a unique viral RNA and infectious virus load analyses to compare Delta and Omicron samples from unvaccinated, fully vaccinated, and patients with booster vaccination. Implications of all the available evidenceOmicron associated with a significant increase in infections in fully and booster vaccinated individuals but with less admissions and ICU level care. Admitted patients showed similar requirements for supplemental oxygen and ICU level care when compared to Delta admitted patients. Viral loads were similar in samples from Omicron and Delta infected patients regardless of the vaccination status. The recovery of infectious virus on cell culture was reduced in samples from patients infected with Delta who received a booster dose, but this was not the case with Omicron. The recovery of infectious virus was equivalent in Omicron infected unvaccinated, fully vaccinated, and samples from patients who received booster vaccination. FundingNIH/NIAID Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance contract HHS N2772201400007C, Johns Hopkins University, Maryland department of health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contract 75D30121C11061.